Tika Adilah Mutiara
Fani Nurona Cahya


Penelitian ini mencoba untuk menguji penerimaan calon guru terhadap penggunaan teknologi dalam pendidikan dengan menggunakan metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) sebagai pendekatan analisis. Ada Empat faktor TAM yaitu Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan (Perceived Ease of Use), Persepsi Manfaat­­ (Perceived usefulness), sikap terhadap penggunaan komputer (Attitude Toward Computer Use), dan niat untuk menggunakan (Intention to Use). Niat Perilaku digunakan sebagai faktor model evaluasi untuk mengukur penerimaan teknologi oleh calon guru dan total empat hipotesis diajukan. Sebuah kuesioner online dilakukan untuk mengekstraksi informasi dari calon guru di berbagai universitas di Indonesia dan total responden sebanyak 120 responden dikumpulkan. Hasil analisis menjelaskan bahwa penerimaan untuk penggunaan Teknologi dapat dijelaskan oleh faktor-faktor yang dievaluasi. Temuan kami menggambarkan bahwa dari empat hipotesis terdapat tiga hipotesis yang  memiliki konstruk yang saling terkait (diterima) sedangkan satu hipotesis yaitu Persepsi Manfaat­­ (Perceived usefulness) kepada sikap terhadap penggunaan komputer (Attitude Toward Computer Use) tidak saling terkait (ditolak). Untuk menjelaskan perilaku calon guru terhadap penggunaan teknologi dalam Pendidikan, sikap terhadap penggunaan komputer (Attitude Toward Computer Use) ditentukan sebagai faktor kunci.



Al-emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). SC. Computers & Education.
Ali, Z. (2016). Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis. (54), 662–669.
Aypay, A., Çelik, H. C., Aypay, A., & Sever, M. (2012). Technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 264–272.
Bühlmann, P., & Geer, S. Van De. (2018). Statistics for big data : A perspective Statistics for Big Data : A Perspective. Statistics and Probability Letters.
Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations. (March).
Davis, F. D. (1989). Delle vicende dell’agricoltura in Italia; studio e note di C. Bertagnolli. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology., 13(3), 319–340.
Ghozali, I. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (3rd ed.). Retrieved from
Gomez, L. E., Verdugo, M. A., & Arias, B. (2015). Research in Developmental Disabilities Validity and reliability of the INICO-FEAPS Scale : An assessment of quality of life for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 600–610.
Gupta, C. Das. (2012). Role of ICT in Improving the Quality of School Education in Bihar.
Hartono, A. W.-S. N. D., & 2018, U. (2018). Pengaruh Computer Anxiety Dan Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) Terhadap Technostress Pada Karyawan Koperasi Di. Seminar.Umpo.Ac.Id, 34–57.
Hootman, R., Muñoz, A., & Civille, G. (2008). The Spectrum Descriptive Analysis Method. In Manual on Descriptive Analysis Testing for Sensory Evaluation.
Izdihar, R. P., Maryono, M., & Du, Y. L. (2017). Discriminant Validity Assessment : Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion Discriminant Validity Assessment : Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion.
Kapur, R. (2019). Use of ICT in Improving Quality of Education.
Kaur, N. (2015). Using ICT in Empowering Teachers for Quality Education. 14–15.
Kemendikbud. (2013). full-text.
Lemay, D. J., Morin, M. M., Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018). Modeling Students ’ Perceptions of Simulation-Based Learning Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 20, 28–37.
Lin, S. C., Persada, S. F., & Nadlifatin, R. (2014). A study of student behavior in accepting the Blackboard Learning System: A Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 18th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, CSCWD 2014, 457–462.
Martin, W. B. (2000). Learning from the Colwell school: An ethnographic case study of an educational.
Ng, W. (2015). New Digital Technology in Education: Conceptualizing Professional Learning For Educators.
Nugroho, M. A., & Fajar, M. A. (2018). ScienceDirect Effects of Technology Readiness Towards Acceptance of Mandatory Web-Based Attendance System. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 319–328.
Plouffe, R. A., Paunonen, S. V, & Saklofske, D. H. (2017). Item properties and the convergent validity of personality assessment : A peer rating study ☆. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 96–105.
Rafiei, N., & Davari, F. (2015). The Role of Human Resources Management on Enhancing the Teaching Skills of Faculty Members. (December 2014), 35–38.
Rezaei, S. (2015). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Segmenting consumer decision-making styles ( CDMS ) toward marketing practice : A partial least squares ( PLS ) path modeling approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 1–15.
Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers and Education, 53(3), 1000–1009.
Teo, T., Milutinović, V., & Zhou, M. (2016). Modelling Serbian pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A SEM and MIMIC approach. Computers and Education, 94, 77–88.
Thompson, C. B. (2009). Descriptive Data Analysis. Air Medical Journal, 28(2), 56–59.
Vet, H. C. W. De, Mokkink, L. B., Mosmuller, D. G., & Terwee, C. B. (2017). Spearman e Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach ’ s alpha : different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 85, 45–49.
Yang, J., & Lee, J. (2019). Application of Sensory Descriptive Analysis and Consumer Studies to Investigate Traditional and Authentic Foods : A Review. 1–17.
Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2019). Computers & Education Modeling the intention to use machine translation for student translators : An extension of Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 133(August 2018), 116–126.